Could Abraham have met Noah? Did they overlap?
According to the Masoretic Text's genealogical numbers, Noah died when Abraham was 58 years old — they were contemporaries. The Septuagint's numbers place 722 years between Noah's death and Abraham's birth. The two oldest witnesses give contradictory answers.
It depends entirely on which manuscript tradition you use — and the two oldest witnesses give opposite answers.
The Hebrew Bible's two most ancient texts, the Masoretic Text (MT) and the Greek Septuagint (LXX), both record the patriarchal ages from Genesis 5 and 11. But their numbers disagree by about 100 years per patriarch — and that difference completely changes the timeline.
If you follow the Masoretic Text, the answer is yes, they could have met. Working through the ages, Noah dies in the year 2006 from creation. Abraham is born in 1948. That puts Noah alive until Abraham is 58 years old. And Shem — the son of Noah who actually walked off the ark — doesn't die until 2156, which is 33 years after Abraham's death. On the MT's numbers, Abraham and Shem were contemporaries for his entire life.
"Noah lived after the flood three hundred and fifty years. So all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years, and he died." — Genesis 9:28–29
If you follow the Septuagint, the answer is no. The LXX's longer begetting ages push Noah's death to 2592 AM and Abraham's birth to 3314 AM. That's a gap of 722 years — no overlap, no possibility of meeting.
The pattern of disagreement is too systematic to be coincidence. For the six pre-flood patriarchs from Adam to Enoch, the LXX begetting age is exactly 100 years higher than the MT in each case. The same +100 pattern holds for six of the eight post-flood patriarchs. In both traditions the total lifespans are usually preserved — the 100 years gets added to one column and subtracted from the other. And then the LXX adds an entire extra generation, Cainan, that the MT doesn't have.
Someone changed the numbers deliberately. The full study traces the external evidence for which tradition changed them — and what the motivation likely was.
Did the Masoretic Text or the Septuagint change the patriarchal ages in Genesis?
The external evidence favors the MT reducing the numbers rather than the LXX inflating them. Demetrius the Chronographer (3rd century BC) uses the longer LXX chronology from the very beginning of that translation tradition. Josephus uses the LXX begetting ages. Luke includes Cainan. Jubilees includes Cainan in a Qumran manuscript. The shorter MT numbers have no independent witness before the late 1st century AD rabbinic standardization.
Who is Cainan in Luke's genealogy, and why isn't he in Genesis?
Cainan appears between Arphaxad and Shelah in Luke 3:35–36 and LXX Genesis 11:12–13, but is absent from the Masoretic Text of Genesis 11. The LXX inserts him in at least four separate passages; the MT omits him in all four. Both traditions are ancient — a Dead Sea Scroll (4Q27) preserves a related reading.